Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Bodell, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Bodell, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

other

Microsomal and peroxidase activation of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen to form DNA adducts: comparison with DNA adducts formed in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen

Deena N. Pathak, Krisztina Pongracz and William J. Bodell 1

Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143–0806, USA

1To whom correspondence should be addressed

Using rat liver microsomal preparations and peroxidase enzymes, we have investigated the formation of DNA adducts by the antiestrogen compound tamoxifen (TAM) and its metabolite 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4-OH-TAM). When reduced nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) was used as a cofactor in microsomal activation of either 4-OH-TAM or TAM, one DNA adduct and relative DNA adduct levels of 4.6 and 3.1x10–8, respectively were detected by 32P-postlabeling. The DNA adduct produced by microsomal activation of 4-OH-TAM and TAM was the same. With cumene hydroperoxide (CuOOH) as the cofactor for the microsomal activation of either 4-OH-TAM or TAM, three to six DNA adducts were produced; the relative adduct levels were 8.0 and 20.6x10–8, respectively. Comparison of the DNA adduct patterns produced by 4-OH-TAM and TAM showed that they were distinct However one of the DNA adducts (a) produced by microsomal activation of 4-OH-TAM using CuOOH was the same as adduct a produced by microsomal activation of 4-OH-TAM with NADPH. Activation of 4-OH-TAM with horseradish peroxidase resulted in the formation of a single DNA adduct and a relative adduct level of 20.7x10–8. Rechromatography analysis of this DNA adduct showed that it was identical to that produced by microsomal activation of 4-OH-TAM with NADPH and one of the adducts produced using CuOOH as the cofactor. Ten DNA adducts and a relative adduct level of 15.3x10–8 were detected in the liver of female Sprague-Dawley rats treated daily with 20 mg/kg of TAM for 7 days. The DNA adduct pattern in the liver of the treated animals was similar to that produced by microsomal activation of TAM using CuOOH as the co-factor. The principal DNA adduct (no. 6) formed in the livers of rats treated with TAM was the same as the principal DNA adduct formed following microsomal activation of TAM using CuOOH as a cofactor. The DNA adduct formed following microsomal activation of either TAM or 4-OH-TAM using NADPH was also present as one of the adducts (1*) formed in vivo following TAM treatment These studies demonstrate that 4-OH-TAM can be activated to form DNA adducts and that it contributes to the formation of DNA adducts in the liver of rats treated with TAM.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. C. Poirier and L. J. Schild
The Genotoxicity of Tamoxifen: Extent and Consequences, Kona, Hawaii, January 23, 2003
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 395 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Sridar, U. M. Kent, L. M. Notley, E. M. J. Gillam, and P. F. Hollenberg
Effect of Tamoxifen on the Enzymatic Activity of Human Cytochrome CYP2B6
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 945 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Kasahara, M. Hashiba, T. Harada, and M. Degawa
Change in the gene expression of hepatic tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes during the process of tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in female rats
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Gamboa da Costa, L.P. McDaniel-Hamilton, R. H. Heflich, M.M. Marques, and F. A. Beland
DNA adduct formation and mutant induction in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen and its derivatives
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2001; 22(8): 1307 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen?
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Umemoto, Y. Monden, M. Suwa, Y. Kanno, M. Suzuki, C.-X. Lin, Y. Ueyama, Md.A. Momen, A. Ravindernath, S. Shibutani, et al.
Identification of hepatic tamoxifen-DNA adducts in mice: {alpha}-(N2-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen and {alpha}-(N2-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen N-oxide
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2000; 21(9): 1737 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. S. Dehal and D. Kupfer
Cytochrome P-450 3A and 2D6 Catalyze Ortho Hydroxylation of 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and 3-Hydroxytamoxifen (Droloxifene) Yielding Tamoxifen Catechol: Involvement of Catechols in Covalent Binding to Hepatic Proteins
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1999; 27(6): 681 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. Sauvez, D. S. Drouin, M. Attia, H. Bertheux, and R. Forster
Cutaneously applied 4-hydroxytamoxifen is not carcinogenic in female rats
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 1999; 20(5): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Boocock, J. L. Maggs, I. N.H. White, and B. K. Park
{alpha}-Hydroxytamoxifen, a genotoxic metabolite of tamoxifen in the rat: identification and quantification in vivo and in vitro
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 153 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.